We engineer your GTM stack with AI & automation at its core—so you can double ARR without doubling headcount
GTM is at an inflection point.
Many of the GTM Advisors you’re speaking with cut their teeth on the old paradigm of scaling through a Capacity Plan.
I know this because I worked for them.
I also know you want the success of a Snowflake, Asana, or MongoDB but these companies are…
The result of this old playbook is “GTM Molasses”.
Which is why all of these companies are struggling with skyrocketing new logo acquisition costs.
On the other hand, AI SDRs are promising to completely replace your sellers.
There’s just one problem.
They don’t work.
And, it’s not because “the tech isn’t good enough yet.”
It’s because winning growth plays are temporary. They work because they are “pattern interrupts”.
What’s left is an “AI personalization arms race”.
…is personalized using the same foundation models (OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta).
And, the result is a deluge of “personalized” emails that are left to die unread in your spam folder.
There is a happy in-between though.
This new movement is called GTM Engineering.
GTM engineered systems look more like a unified development environment than the SDR/AE/RevOps “Factory Model” we have today.
The foundational tool making this possible is Clay.
With Clay, you can…
And, there are other tools you need to integrate with it to get the most out of it.
A GTM Operating System is only as good as the GTM Engineers you have running it.
That’s where GTM6 comes in.
Skip the learning curve.
Future-proof your GTM stack.
And, most importantly…
Unique data is your competitive advantage. Instead of blasting messages to all “SaaS companies with headcounts over 250” we find data like…
We aggregate these data points, create scoring models, and build bi-directional pipelines into your CRM so your data foundation is always up-to-date.
Every great GTM team knows this one truth:
“What works today, won’t work tomorrow.”
Were all blockbusters at one point
Ironically, a plays success is also its downfall. As more people copy, the play loses its “pattern interrupt” effect and it loses its efficacy.
You will not suffer from this problem.
Your GTM stack will let you find “GTM Alpha” because:
Here’s what “fast moving” GTM teams are doing right…
A Software Security Company: Auto-generates personalized landing pages on Webflow for good-fit prospects, using individual company logos and information
An ABM Company: Identifies surging keyword bid prices on Google and automatically message companies on strategies to balance spend across LinkedIn and Meta.
A Hybrid Work Company: Finds new office announcements on Linkedin, checks if they 3+ open hybrid roles—sends personalized direct mail to Office Managers.
A Dev Tools Company: Monitors competitive Github repos for any negative comments or issues and automatically sends an email on how their product solves the problem.
Time kills all deals.
Automate undifferentiated work so your sellers can focus on deal acceleration tasks like…
Example pipelines that automate the grunt work away:
Deliverable: Two campaigns launched into production. All responses managed through a unified inbox or through your reps inboxes.
*We can build call down lists for your reps to to work (queued into your SEP)
Deliverable: One manual workflow fully automated.
Co-Founder & CEO – Clay
GTM Engineering is new disciple emerging from elite GTM teams.
It is the practice of applying a software-engineering mindset—systems design, automation, rapid experimentation, and rigorous instrumentation—to every revenue-generating motion (marketing, sales, success, partnerships).
Instead of adding headcount, a GTM engineer builds and maintains scalable “revenue infrastructure” that turns ideas into repeatable, tech-powered workflows.
No.
A GTM Engineer is a bit of a unicorn.
They are more technical than RevOps. And, have more sales knowledge than a growth marketer.
While both care about new revenue, the difference lies in ownership.
Growth marketers think about channels and campaigns and rely on other teams for implementation.
Whereas a GTM Engineer thinks about repeatable systems and owns implementation end-to-end.
Quick litmus test to tell the difference:
It’s a great question that is still open to debate.
Our experience suggests that Series C and beyond companies should be actively looking to bring a GTM Engineer in-house.
Seed – Series B companies are best suited to work with an agency as the skill set is rare and the time-to-hire is not worth the trade off in speed-to-market.
Absolutely.
All clay tables, email infrastructure, domains, and additional email inboxes are owned by you.
You will be in complete ownership should you choose to stop working with us.
We create detailed operating documents to train your team on how to use what was buit.
Typical engagements are six months in length.
There is usually an initial onboarding and systems build phase before moving into outbound campaigns.
Pricing varies between retainer + pay for performance vs just a retainer.
Your current state and desired outcomes will dictate which is right for you.
For example, RevOps heavy work like CRM enrichment, ICP scoring, and workflow automation is usually retainer base only.
If we build outbound campaigns, pay for performance is typical.